Sunday, May 13, 2012
Film Review 1: Middle Sexes
1. The main thesis of the film Middle Sexes: Redefining He and She is about the individual lives of intersex and transgendered people, as well as individuals who come out of societies set gender roles. In the film we see the challenges and struggles of transgender and intersex people and the similarities of it around the world.
2. Some arguments to support the thesis of the film come from personal opinions and stories told from transgendered and intersex people. We get to see how their experiences are with their lifestyle and how they fit in society. The western world other religious cultures look upon this in a negative way. Transgender and intersex individuals face challenges from family and friends as well. In the film, Noah’s parents are scared for him because they are afraid of what society might do to harm him. One example from the readings is in Robert Saposky’s Testosterone Rules where he mentions interesting facts about testosterone, gender studies and aggression in males. In relation to the film, Noah is depicted as having less masculine characteristics about his self than other boys. Just because he feels this way does not make him less of a male. Noah is young and simply likes what he likes.
3. The thesis of this film related to the course in many ways because we have been discussing gender and biology. One of the main focuses has been on how people identify themselves. This film gives good information as to how intersex and transgender individuals live and deal with society.
4. What I found most convincing is how transgender and intersex people are treated in other cultures. In Thailand, the Koata are often found in what our society considers to be prestigious jobs, such as modeling and the entertainment industry. The intersex and transgendered felt excepted and not demonized I Thailand by society. For years I thought intersex and transgendered individuals were demonized everywhere in the world. This documentary proves to me that this is not true.
5. The arguments I found least convincing were not many. I found that some of individual feelings and opinions on the issue was something that people really believed to be natural. The people made it clear on how they felt and why it is they felt that way.
6. An argument or point I would focus is why the film does little to bring attention to or address why western society has the views it does towards transgendered and intersex people. I would have liked t see more insight on history, policies or legislation that has been set in place, and see what society can do to break the social barriers that are in place currently. In Michael Kimmel’s book The Gendered Society he discusses the relations between biology and gender. Kimmel says “There are many problems with biological research on bases for gender difference and more and greater problems with the extrapolation of those differences to the social world of inequality.” In relation to the film, there is no biological explanation on why these individuals are like this or feel this way. But society should not show animosity towards people like this.
Work Cited
Kimmel, Michael. 2011. “Ordained by Nature: Biology Constructs the Sexes.” Pp. 21-57 in The Gendered Society, 4th edition. NY: Oxford University Press.
Sapolsky, Robert. 1997. “Testosterone Rules.” Pp. 22-26 in The Gendered Society Reader, 4th edition. edited by Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson. NY: Oxford University Press.
Film Review 1: Tough Guise
1. The main thesis of the film Tough Guise addresses how American society has built sociological and cultural ideas about what it is to be masculine, and how a man should be. The media enforces a false representation of a man, which inquires always being strong, tough, and independent. If the male is seen not having these characteristics then his will be made fun of by others. Being seen as weak, fragile, feminine and getting called a “faggot” are some examples. The word “Faggot” can be used by others, not only to reference sexual preference, but to put a person’s masculinity to question.
2. Some of the main arguments to support the thesis were present throughout the movie. Guys were being asked what they consider to be a man or masculine. It is known to many that men do participate in violence most of the time simply to show their masculinity. The examples in the movie did anything it they could to depict and scare those who are not more masculine. In Paul Kivel’s article The Act-Like-a-Man Box he brings interesting focus to the topic of masculinity. Kivel mentions that men feel the need to stay in this box of masculine characteristics to keep from being verbally or physically abused by others (Kivel 14). In relation to the film, guys are programmed to stay inside this box or notion. This is the misconception taught by media and society.
3. This course is all about masculinity and men’s issues, and how people perceive men as the dominant gender in the society. I think this film is related to the course by how we construct gender in society. The film really sheds light on the misrepresentation of how it is to be a man and how society has shifted our thought process.
4. What I found most convincing in the film is that the social institutions should re-consider the idea of masculinity and focus on a less violent approached to these issues. Since we were kids in this society our families started shaping us to become independent, strong and successful at a young age. But not every individual is equal or the same, therefore not everyone should be expected to act the same way. This film made me thinks of how the world is ruled today. It is about man power, who is strong and who is not. From a privilege and race stand point, Jewel Woods brings up interesting things on black males and privilege in his article The Black Privilege Checklist. Woods mentions how the black male is privileged in our society and how it differs for that of white males (Woods 26). He also mentions that there are many similarities between men than there are differences (Woods 26-27). In relation to the film, black men are held to same stereotypes of what it means to be masculine as well. Identifying myself as bi racial, I find this to be true.
5. What I found least convincing is with the notion that violent creates more violent. It is this idea of masculinity that is embedded in us. If we can change what society valued and change the concepts and ideas surrounding masculinity we may help change the behaviors of some individuals.
6. I would conduct an experiment on how the impact of television, movies, and video games has influenced violent behaviors in teenagers and young adults. I would conduct this by having two groups of teenagers and two groups of young adults. Group one will be exposed to sports, country or classical music, and social activities. Group two will be exposed to violent behavior through television, video games, and movies. After a few months I would record all the group’s behaviors by observation, and how they socialize with other groups accordingly.
Work cited
Kivel, Paul. 1984. “The Act-Like-A-Man Box.” Pp. 14-16 in Men’s Lives, 9th edition, edited by Michael S. Kimmel and Michael A. Messner. NJ: Pearson
Woods, Jewel. 2004. “The Black Privilege Checklist.” Pp. 26-31 in Men’s Lives, 9th edition, edited by Michael S. Kimmel and Michael A. Messner. NJ: Pearson
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Offensive Words
Words can be powerful. They can change lives and societies. There are many ways that words can be used. Words can be used out of its original context in ways that can offend or hurt people. Words hold weight in ways that many people cannot imagine. In today’s society many people call each other names and using words without knowing its true meaning and how a word evolved to its so called “new meaning”. The words I decided to focus on are commonly used in our society and can be offensive to many: retard, faggot, or fag. I chose these words to shed light on how they are used, taken out of context, and inconsiderately neglected by how others abuse its terminology.
What’s a retard? The word ‘Retard’ is used to mean relatively slow in mental, emotional or physical development. This word appeared first in Middle English in 1400 (dictionary.com). This word has changed between 1400 and now in a way that is used to demean a person’s character and mind set. What is interesting about the use of the word retard or retarded is that it commonly used in society and has in some cases has become the word of choice within many individuals speech. Frustration of having to take an exam or talking about people is usually attached with using this word out of context, which is pointless and offensive. The fact that this word is said regularly toward and amongst individuals brings my attention to Labeling Theory. According to Howard Becker he says “The deviant is one to whom that label is successfully been applied; deviant behavior is behavior that people so label” (Becker, 1991, 39). If a person says something or acts in a certain way that is frowned upon by another person, they can be labeled. A person who is most likely to use the phrase ‘retard’ or ‘retarded’ is someone who is ignorant and thoughtless to those who have disabilities. The underling construction of the word retarded is that people are mentally slow and incapable of doing something that others are able to do. The word is in many ways compared to being called dumb or stupid because it also gives the label that one is incapable or lacks an ability to do certain things (The Power of Words, Blog 3, 2012).
The community impacted by the “r word” is those who are considered physically or mentally challenged. Being called retarded is also similar to the phrase “That’s gay”. Another theory that comes to mind in relation to this issue is the Shaming Theory. A person can be perceived as deviant because of an act or behavior, which is tied into stigmatization. John Braithwaite mentions that shaming means all social processes of expressing disapproval that has the effect of provoking remorse in the individual being condemned by others who become aware of the shaming (Braithwaite 1989,34). Many people view this community as “retarded” and “stupid” automatically when that is not the case. The clip below shows how offensive words can be and how we need to be careful of the words we choose to use when speaking to or around other people. The members of the relevant community show that this word needs to stop being used.
I personally have grown to understand that being called retarded or retard is not acceptable to this community, even though society may view them that way. I have a relative who is a part of this community (The Power of Words, Blog 4, 2012). And I can say he fits in just fine with society without a needing label. The norms that are socially constructed in this country have made individuals think ignorant, selfish and careless. That way of thinking does not make issues better. A message from Wanda Sykes brings attention to this. The clip below relates to this issue also, though it is another phrase commonly used. Not realizing what we say is insulting to other individuals. Case and point, phrases like “That’s so retarded” or “What a retard” are phrases that hurt people’s feelings and put them down (The Power of Words, Blog 4, 2012). . People need to watch their words and think of those they will affect before they say it.
The other word I wanted to focus on in depth is the word ‘Fag’ or ‘Faggot’, which refers to a homosexual male. Now it is a generic term of contempt, roughly equivalent to, "I'm a better man than you are and, on a side note, you look somewhat effeminate!" (UrbanDictionary.com). I regard to the history of this word, the origin of faggot, the word for a bundle of sticks, is unknown (UrbanDictionary.com). The English word comes from the French fagot and there is a cognate in Italian fagotto, so there may be some common Latin root (Wordorgins.org). But if so, it has been lost (Wordorgins.org). The current connotations of this word are to either put down a male who is seen as acting to feminine or acting in a way that is not masculine enough for certain individuals. Many people can use this word offensively towards others who consider themselves to be gay or lesbian. Those who are more likely to use the word out of context are heterosexual males and even females who hate or dislike homosexuals and those who prefer a certain life styles. To shed some insight on how this word and how it can be used in certain ways, below is a video clip of comedian Chris Rock. Chris Rock gives a humorous but honest example on the context of how the word ‘fag’ can be used and how people need to watch what they say and how they say it. The underlying social constructions of this word as mention before are aimed at individuals who are homosexual or even straight heterosexual men who act feminine, and may tend to like or do things that are not considered masculine. This reminds me back when I was in high school where name calling and joking with others was common. There were many students who were careless about others feelings and were disrespectful to people who were considered outcasts. I can remember there being one fight about every two weeks in my school. Something that has stuck with since high school was when my friend Andrew was called multiple names by other male students during gym class. Not very many people knew he was gay, and those that did kept quiet. Andrew was not the best athlete, but he caught on to sports very quick. That day in gym we were playing basketball and Andrew had cost his team the game. Because of this he was called a fag, a queer, and pussy for his style of play. I will never forget the look on his face when he was called all those names. I can tell it tore him up inside. A few days later I noticed Andrew had not been in class for a few days. When he eventually returned to class and the same guys made fun of him after another loss while playing a competitive sport. I can remember these guys calling him the same names as before. Unexpected, Andrew stood up to the guys and simply said he was comfortable with who they said he was. The response was priceless and something I will never forget. It was like he was completely at calm with who he was and did not care about what others thought anymore. I say that to say this, words to have an affect on people. Andrew’s situation can easily be related toward Labeling Theory. Instead I feel that Michael Kimmel and Matthew Mahler’s article What Triggers School Shootings relates to this as well. Kimmel and Mahler mention some interesting problems that kids face, and what causes kids to lose it. Kimmel and Mahler say “The impact of homophobia is felt not only by gay lesbian students but also by heterosexuals who are targeted by their peers for constant harassment, bullying, and gay baiting. In many cases, gay baiting is “misdirected” at heterosexual youth who may be somewhat gender nonconforming. This fact is clearly evidenced in many of the accounts we have gathered of the shootings”. (Kimmel, Mahler, 2003, 78). Even with being called names and being harassed Andrew kept his calm and accepted what he was despite what others thought of him. The communities who are impacted by the word faggot are the LGBT community, and even heterosexuals. There has been some debate over the use of the word from the LGBT community. According to Mara Keisling and Randall Jenson in their debate If LGBT Community Should Use Words Like 'Faggot' And 'Tranny', they mention “While some maintain that the words should be avoided at all costs because of how stigmatizing and demoralizing they can be, others believe that the words lose their negative associations and become empowering when they are reclaimed by LGBT people”. (Huffington Post, 2012). This is very typical for both sides of the argument. Some people want to not use the words and others do not find anything wrong with using it. This also is in many ways related to race and the use of the ‘n’ word among African Americans. I consider myself to be African American, and when it comes to the ‘n’ word I choose not to use it because I feel that there is no reason for its use. My parents did not raise me to use such words. I grew up in a strict Christian home and that had an influence on how wisely I chose to speak my words. My cousins and black friends use the word all the time and it never offends me because I know not to perceive it as aimed directly towards me. On the other side of using this word, other individuals may use it as a way of expression. If a white person says the word it is viewed as racism or it can also be taking into the context of trying to act black. When black people use the word it can be taken as an expression or offensive term depending on how it is said. Both words are offensive to many but others people do not see the harm in calling an individual this name because of choice. To illustrate what I mean, below is a clip from poet Julian Curry on the ‘n’ word. Curry breaks down the use of the word in many forms and how it has shaped America and the African American culture. Another clip that I came across is one opinion of a person who opposes the use of the word gay and faggot. He explains the reasons why it should not be used. In conclusion, I chose to research on the two words retard and faggot because I never knew the history, extent, and full context of how the word can be used. There is no doubt that these words are powerful and impact lives people are careless to consider. Let us remember that people have been murdered, harassed, bullied, beat up, demoted, discharged, fired and emotionally traumatized because of the use of the words in which we speak. This country has had a history of troubled times which has shaped who we are as a nation. It is important to know the history of where words originally come from and focus on how they became a different meaning in society today. These words can be meant to target deviant behaviors and the characteristics of individuals who do not fit the norms of this society. In the film Tough Guise, Jackson Katz does a great job discussing the differences and changes in the true meaning of what it means to be masculine. He also goes further to mention that society and media place a standard on males to put pressure on other males to maintain their masculine standard. The beginning of this film starts out by showing what happens to guys if they do not meet masculine standard. They guys all responded by saying they would be called names. The weight of words has become controversial and can become a problem for all those who are offended no matter what sexual orientation or race you are. If we all stop and take a moment to understand that words are powerful, and watch what it is we say, the problem may improve. Word Count: 2079 Work Cited/ References Becker, Howard S. Labeling Theory. Chapter 7. Readings Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA. Braithwaite, John. Shaming Theory. Chapter 6. Readings Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/retardation http://www.wordorigins.org/index.php/more/285/ http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fag Jhally Sut, Katz Jackson. Tough Guise (Unabridged) Violence, Media & the Crisis in Masculinity, 1999). Lightner, Rod. The Power of Words, Blog Post 3, 2012. Keisling Mara, Jenson Randall. If LGBT Community Should Use Words Like 'Faggot' And 'Tranny'. Huffingon Post. 2012. Kimmel Michael and Mahler Matthew. Chapter 13, What Triggers School Shootings. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA
I personally have grown to understand that being called retarded or retard is not acceptable to this community, even though society may view them that way. I have a relative who is a part of this community (The Power of Words, Blog 4, 2012). And I can say he fits in just fine with society without a needing label. The norms that are socially constructed in this country have made individuals think ignorant, selfish and careless. That way of thinking does not make issues better. A message from Wanda Sykes brings attention to this. The clip below relates to this issue also, though it is another phrase commonly used. Not realizing what we say is insulting to other individuals. Case and point, phrases like “That’s so retarded” or “What a retard” are phrases that hurt people’s feelings and put them down (The Power of Words, Blog 4, 2012). . People need to watch their words and think of those they will affect before they say it.
The other word I wanted to focus on in depth is the word ‘Fag’ or ‘Faggot’, which refers to a homosexual male. Now it is a generic term of contempt, roughly equivalent to, "I'm a better man than you are and, on a side note, you look somewhat effeminate!" (UrbanDictionary.com). I regard to the history of this word, the origin of faggot, the word for a bundle of sticks, is unknown (UrbanDictionary.com). The English word comes from the French fagot and there is a cognate in Italian fagotto, so there may be some common Latin root (Wordorgins.org). But if so, it has been lost (Wordorgins.org). The current connotations of this word are to either put down a male who is seen as acting to feminine or acting in a way that is not masculine enough for certain individuals. Many people can use this word offensively towards others who consider themselves to be gay or lesbian. Those who are more likely to use the word out of context are heterosexual males and even females who hate or dislike homosexuals and those who prefer a certain life styles. To shed some insight on how this word and how it can be used in certain ways, below is a video clip of comedian Chris Rock. Chris Rock gives a humorous but honest example on the context of how the word ‘fag’ can be used and how people need to watch what they say and how they say it. The underlying social constructions of this word as mention before are aimed at individuals who are homosexual or even straight heterosexual men who act feminine, and may tend to like or do things that are not considered masculine. This reminds me back when I was in high school where name calling and joking with others was common. There were many students who were careless about others feelings and were disrespectful to people who were considered outcasts. I can remember there being one fight about every two weeks in my school. Something that has stuck with since high school was when my friend Andrew was called multiple names by other male students during gym class. Not very many people knew he was gay, and those that did kept quiet. Andrew was not the best athlete, but he caught on to sports very quick. That day in gym we were playing basketball and Andrew had cost his team the game. Because of this he was called a fag, a queer, and pussy for his style of play. I will never forget the look on his face when he was called all those names. I can tell it tore him up inside. A few days later I noticed Andrew had not been in class for a few days. When he eventually returned to class and the same guys made fun of him after another loss while playing a competitive sport. I can remember these guys calling him the same names as before. Unexpected, Andrew stood up to the guys and simply said he was comfortable with who they said he was. The response was priceless and something I will never forget. It was like he was completely at calm with who he was and did not care about what others thought anymore. I say that to say this, words to have an affect on people. Andrew’s situation can easily be related toward Labeling Theory. Instead I feel that Michael Kimmel and Matthew Mahler’s article What Triggers School Shootings relates to this as well. Kimmel and Mahler mention some interesting problems that kids face, and what causes kids to lose it. Kimmel and Mahler say “The impact of homophobia is felt not only by gay lesbian students but also by heterosexuals who are targeted by their peers for constant harassment, bullying, and gay baiting. In many cases, gay baiting is “misdirected” at heterosexual youth who may be somewhat gender nonconforming. This fact is clearly evidenced in many of the accounts we have gathered of the shootings”. (Kimmel, Mahler, 2003, 78). Even with being called names and being harassed Andrew kept his calm and accepted what he was despite what others thought of him. The communities who are impacted by the word faggot are the LGBT community, and even heterosexuals. There has been some debate over the use of the word from the LGBT community. According to Mara Keisling and Randall Jenson in their debate If LGBT Community Should Use Words Like 'Faggot' And 'Tranny', they mention “While some maintain that the words should be avoided at all costs because of how stigmatizing and demoralizing they can be, others believe that the words lose their negative associations and become empowering when they are reclaimed by LGBT people”. (Huffington Post, 2012). This is very typical for both sides of the argument. Some people want to not use the words and others do not find anything wrong with using it. This also is in many ways related to race and the use of the ‘n’ word among African Americans. I consider myself to be African American, and when it comes to the ‘n’ word I choose not to use it because I feel that there is no reason for its use. My parents did not raise me to use such words. I grew up in a strict Christian home and that had an influence on how wisely I chose to speak my words. My cousins and black friends use the word all the time and it never offends me because I know not to perceive it as aimed directly towards me. On the other side of using this word, other individuals may use it as a way of expression. If a white person says the word it is viewed as racism or it can also be taking into the context of trying to act black. When black people use the word it can be taken as an expression or offensive term depending on how it is said. Both words are offensive to many but others people do not see the harm in calling an individual this name because of choice. To illustrate what I mean, below is a clip from poet Julian Curry on the ‘n’ word. Curry breaks down the use of the word in many forms and how it has shaped America and the African American culture. Another clip that I came across is one opinion of a person who opposes the use of the word gay and faggot. He explains the reasons why it should not be used. In conclusion, I chose to research on the two words retard and faggot because I never knew the history, extent, and full context of how the word can be used. There is no doubt that these words are powerful and impact lives people are careless to consider. Let us remember that people have been murdered, harassed, bullied, beat up, demoted, discharged, fired and emotionally traumatized because of the use of the words in which we speak. This country has had a history of troubled times which has shaped who we are as a nation. It is important to know the history of where words originally come from and focus on how they became a different meaning in society today. These words can be meant to target deviant behaviors and the characteristics of individuals who do not fit the norms of this society. In the film Tough Guise, Jackson Katz does a great job discussing the differences and changes in the true meaning of what it means to be masculine. He also goes further to mention that society and media place a standard on males to put pressure on other males to maintain their masculine standard. The beginning of this film starts out by showing what happens to guys if they do not meet masculine standard. They guys all responded by saying they would be called names. The weight of words has become controversial and can become a problem for all those who are offended no matter what sexual orientation or race you are. If we all stop and take a moment to understand that words are powerful, and watch what it is we say, the problem may improve. Word Count: 2079 Work Cited/ References Becker, Howard S. Labeling Theory. Chapter 7. Readings Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA. Braithwaite, John. Shaming Theory. Chapter 6. Readings Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/retardation http://www.wordorigins.org/index.php/more/285/ http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fag Jhally Sut, Katz Jackson. Tough Guise (Unabridged) Violence, Media & the Crisis in Masculinity, 1999). Lightner, Rod. The Power of Words, Blog Post 3, 2012. Keisling Mara, Jenson Randall. If LGBT Community Should Use Words Like 'Faggot' And 'Tranny'. Huffingon Post. 2012. Kimmel Michael and Mahler Matthew. Chapter 13, What Triggers School Shootings. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA
Sunday, April 8, 2012
Film Review: Live Nude Girls Unite
The main thesis of the film Live Nude Girls Unite is about a group of exotic dancers who fought for fair wages and better working conditions by forming a union. Their work was not seen as meaningful and they were not treated fair. The assumption that there work was not real work was part of their argument. The women in the film showed that they were hard working and deserved the same rights and protection just as any other occupation would give.
The main argument to support the thesis in the film was about the workers being treated fair in an establishment called the The Lusty Lady in San Francisco. The workers argued that their privacy was being taken advantage of, the wages were unfair, and that discrimination and bad working conditions needed to change. The worker received help from the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). The SEIU helped the workers through the process by making agreements and negotiations with the employer. The worker got what they wanted and it had such an impact that other exotic dancers unionized.
The film relates to the course by showing how society can treat people who are labeled deviant based off what they do for work. Author Jennifer K. Wesley of Exotic Dancers: “Where Am I Going to Stop” explains some of the key factors and realities that relate to exotic dancing. Wesley says “An exotic dancer’s success is measured by the amount of money for a nights work” (Calhoun, Conyers & Thio, Readings in Deviant Behavior p.210). Wesley also mentions how this kind of work can relate with identity conflict. The woman is seen an object and not seen for who they really are. Society makes it seem that working in the sex industry is so horrible and they do not deserve the stigmatization. In the film The Codes of Gender it discusses on how the treatment of women in any industry are seen as weak, powerless, and unequal compared to a male.
One of the arguments that I found most convincing was that women are treated unfair in the sex industry. Their work is hard and at times dangerous to do. The rights they fought for to have a better working atmosphere was needed. Many of these dancers are smart and educated, and they said they were in it for the extra money. Some were also single moms who needed the extra income. If I were to conduct a study, I would study where the exotic dancers see themselves in 10 years. I would also study the changes dancers think might happen over the years in this industry, if any. It would be interesting to see how the industry is 10 years from now, even though money is always the key factors of these businesses.
The main argument to support the thesis in the film was about the workers being treated fair in an establishment called the The Lusty Lady in San Francisco. The workers argued that their privacy was being taken advantage of, the wages were unfair, and that discrimination and bad working conditions needed to change. The worker received help from the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). The SEIU helped the workers through the process by making agreements and negotiations with the employer. The worker got what they wanted and it had such an impact that other exotic dancers unionized.
The film relates to the course by showing how society can treat people who are labeled deviant based off what they do for work. Author Jennifer K. Wesley of Exotic Dancers: “Where Am I Going to Stop” explains some of the key factors and realities that relate to exotic dancing. Wesley says “An exotic dancer’s success is measured by the amount of money for a nights work” (Calhoun, Conyers & Thio, Readings in Deviant Behavior p.210). Wesley also mentions how this kind of work can relate with identity conflict. The woman is seen an object and not seen for who they really are. Society makes it seem that working in the sex industry is so horrible and they do not deserve the stigmatization. In the film The Codes of Gender it discusses on how the treatment of women in any industry are seen as weak, powerless, and unequal compared to a male.
One of the arguments that I found most convincing was that women are treated unfair in the sex industry. Their work is hard and at times dangerous to do. The rights they fought for to have a better working atmosphere was needed. Many of these dancers are smart and educated, and they said they were in it for the extra money. Some were also single moms who needed the extra income. If I were to conduct a study, I would study where the exotic dancers see themselves in 10 years. I would also study the changes dancers think might happen over the years in this industry, if any. It would be interesting to see how the industry is 10 years from now, even though money is always the key factors of these businesses.
Sunday, March 25, 2012
What about Autism?
There are many diseases and disorders that seem to be developing at a rapid and unexplained rate in this society. Many Americans perceive these to be an illness or a deviant condition. One of the “illnesses” that is very common in our society today is autism. What is autism? How and why has it developed? According to the Autism Science Foundation (ASF), autism, or Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), is characterized by impairments in social interaction and communication skills, as well as extremely challenging behaviors. The behaviors include repetitive motor behaviors like, hand flapping, body rocking, insistence on sameness, resistance to change, and in some cases self-injury or aggression. Many individuals with ASD have impairments, although some have low or even above average IQ’s. Thirty to Fifty percent of people with autism also have seizures (ASF.org). Dr. Leo Kanner first described autism in 1943. He reported on children who showed a lack of interest in other people, but they had a highly unusual interest in an inanimate environment (ASF.org). At the time autism was thought to be an early form of schizophrenia. This led to the belief that its onset could be caused by bad parenting or a negative experience ASF.org. Studies have shown this is not the issue. Looking into to autism and the disorders, there are five autism spectrum disorders. These are sometimes called Pervasive Development Disorders (PDD). The disorders are pervasive developmental delay, autism; which is sometimes referred to as classic autism, childhood autism or autistic disorder, asperger syndrome, rett syndrome, and childhood disintegrative disorder (ASF.org).
What causes autism is uncertain. What is supposedly “certain” is that most autism can be detected in infants as young as six to eighteen months (ASF.org). However, in an article by Jeremy Minyard called The Autism Information Epidemic, he says “There are no reliable biological indicators in most cases of autism. Behavioral symptoms vary widely and often overlap with other neurological disorders. The initiative of parents in identifying these symptoms in their own children, and encouraging a doctor to do the same, makes diagnosis of the disorder much more likely”. Many scientists have determined autism comes from genetically based conditions according to the ASF. Scientists are unsure if any environmental triggers may be the cause or the main factor involved with this condition (ASF.org). There are also theories that have become popular in recent years. One of the theories is that autism is due to what is put in a child’s vaccine and food. In the two video clips below, highly rated talk show host Alex Jones breaks this issue down by using declassified government documentation, and reasons behind this issue. In these alarming videos Jones tries to make it clear to your attention. After watching these video clips or reading this blog, I highly recommend that you research and follow up on what Alex Jones is discussing. Most importantly, research the issue of autism. You can also visit infowars.com for further information. Caution, you may receive an awaking.
According to the ASF, autism is four times more likely to affect boys than girls. This is also found in all racial, ethnic, and social groups. In an article by Michelle Diament called Minorities Show More Severe Signs of Autism, it mentions that it is unclear exactly why children from minority backgrounds are diagnosed with autism later. The researchers from this article say it could be related to cultural differences in how people perceive development as a child. Another interesting point mentioned in Diaments article from researchers says “They could not rule out the possibility that there may be biological differences in the manifestation of autism among different ethnic groups contributing to the more pronounced delays observed in children from minority backgrounds”. In relation to deviance, this is an underlining social construction that impacts this illness and perception. Minorities should not be automatically labeled deviant because of a perception or sign of autistic symptoms.
One of my brother’s friends is an African American living with autism. You would not know it if you met him. Throughout the ten years I have known him; he eventually came out and told his friends he was autistic. At first we laughed in disbelief thinking there was no way he could have been autistic. One night I asked both of his parents about his condition and found out it was a fact. For having autism, his IQ is fairly high. He is a graduate of the University of Washington. This is a prime example of the misconceptions about autism. Society has this belief that those living with this condition are not able to do what others can. The reality is, as we learn more about autism truth gets revealed.
Word Count: 784
Work Cited:
http://contexts.org/discoveries/the-autism-information-epidemic/
http://mtdiablosped.blogspot.com/2012/02/minorities-show-more-severe-signs-of.html
http://autismsciencefoundation.org/
What causes autism is uncertain. What is supposedly “certain” is that most autism can be detected in infants as young as six to eighteen months (ASF.org). However, in an article by Jeremy Minyard called The Autism Information Epidemic, he says “There are no reliable biological indicators in most cases of autism. Behavioral symptoms vary widely and often overlap with other neurological disorders. The initiative of parents in identifying these symptoms in their own children, and encouraging a doctor to do the same, makes diagnosis of the disorder much more likely”. Many scientists have determined autism comes from genetically based conditions according to the ASF. Scientists are unsure if any environmental triggers may be the cause or the main factor involved with this condition (ASF.org). There are also theories that have become popular in recent years. One of the theories is that autism is due to what is put in a child’s vaccine and food. In the two video clips below, highly rated talk show host Alex Jones breaks this issue down by using declassified government documentation, and reasons behind this issue. In these alarming videos Jones tries to make it clear to your attention. After watching these video clips or reading this blog, I highly recommend that you research and follow up on what Alex Jones is discussing. Most importantly, research the issue of autism. You can also visit infowars.com for further information. Caution, you may receive an awaking.
According to the ASF, autism is four times more likely to affect boys than girls. This is also found in all racial, ethnic, and social groups. In an article by Michelle Diament called Minorities Show More Severe Signs of Autism, it mentions that it is unclear exactly why children from minority backgrounds are diagnosed with autism later. The researchers from this article say it could be related to cultural differences in how people perceive development as a child. Another interesting point mentioned in Diaments article from researchers says “They could not rule out the possibility that there may be biological differences in the manifestation of autism among different ethnic groups contributing to the more pronounced delays observed in children from minority backgrounds”. In relation to deviance, this is an underlining social construction that impacts this illness and perception. Minorities should not be automatically labeled deviant because of a perception or sign of autistic symptoms.
One of my brother’s friends is an African American living with autism. You would not know it if you met him. Throughout the ten years I have known him; he eventually came out and told his friends he was autistic. At first we laughed in disbelief thinking there was no way he could have been autistic. One night I asked both of his parents about his condition and found out it was a fact. For having autism, his IQ is fairly high. He is a graduate of the University of Washington. This is a prime example of the misconceptions about autism. Society has this belief that those living with this condition are not able to do what others can. The reality is, as we learn more about autism truth gets revealed.
Word Count: 784
Work Cited:
http://contexts.org/discoveries/the-autism-information-epidemic/
http://mtdiablosped.blogspot.com/2012/02/minorities-show-more-severe-signs-of.html
http://autismsciencefoundation.org/
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Film Review 4: Generation Rx
The film Generation Rx is an informative film about the result of medication and the effect they have on children in our society. According to the film the marketing of prescribed drugs had a 400% increase in mood altering. America is also the largest supplier of Ritalin and other prescribed drugs in the world. Billions of dollars were given to pharmaceutical companies to drug children. This film takes a look into how this epidemic occurred and the consequences brought on the American society.
The main argument to support the thesis of this film is that the chemicals that are in these drugs are blocking and damaging the normal functions of how the brain is suppose to work. One other point mentioned in the film was that these drugs were never meant to be for or inside children.
This film relates to the course because the class has been discussing deviant minds. In the film, deviant minds are considered the children with ADHD. In the early findings of ADHD it was not considered a disease but rather a kid being a kid. Decades later this diagnosis became common psychiatric problem among children America. Kids with “considered” disorders or behavior problems are labeled as deviant in society and are presumed not to have brighter futures.
The argument I found most convincing children and committing suicide and have violent behavior problems. Another fact that from the film was the effects in had on both children and adults. The FDA did a poor job in finding out what the causes of the effects were. In a short time of taking the drugs people would get awful thoughts and nightmares.
There was nothing I felt that was least convincing in this film. Parents have to ask themselves “Do I really need to get my child on a drug to get his/her mind functioning like other kids?” It is not only the prescribed drugs in America that is harming our society; it is also what is in our food.
I would study the FDA council and find out what is really going on. I would do this by focusing on the studies conducted, where money has gone, and how and why these drugs are still being prescribed. The end result would need to indictments and prison sentences. There is no excuse for drugs to be placed on shelves or behind counters without clear and sufficient studies on the effects they have. This is big business created by the “elite” above government to defuse and betray the American people.
The main argument to support the thesis of this film is that the chemicals that are in these drugs are blocking and damaging the normal functions of how the brain is suppose to work. One other point mentioned in the film was that these drugs were never meant to be for or inside children.
This film relates to the course because the class has been discussing deviant minds. In the film, deviant minds are considered the children with ADHD. In the early findings of ADHD it was not considered a disease but rather a kid being a kid. Decades later this diagnosis became common psychiatric problem among children America. Kids with “considered” disorders or behavior problems are labeled as deviant in society and are presumed not to have brighter futures.
The argument I found most convincing children and committing suicide and have violent behavior problems. Another fact that from the film was the effects in had on both children and adults. The FDA did a poor job in finding out what the causes of the effects were. In a short time of taking the drugs people would get awful thoughts and nightmares.
There was nothing I felt that was least convincing in this film. Parents have to ask themselves “Do I really need to get my child on a drug to get his/her mind functioning like other kids?” It is not only the prescribed drugs in America that is harming our society; it is also what is in our food.
I would study the FDA council and find out what is really going on. I would do this by focusing on the studies conducted, where money has gone, and how and why these drugs are still being prescribed. The end result would need to indictments and prison sentences. There is no excuse for drugs to be placed on shelves or behind counters without clear and sufficient studies on the effects they have. This is big business created by the “elite” above government to defuse and betray the American people.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Film Review 3: Tough Guise
The main thesis of the film “Tough Guise” is the men need to be masculine, tough and violent to be recognized as a real man. Anything feminine or gay is to be hated and looked down upon in order for the male to prove what it take to be a man in society, One other feature of this film that is boldly emphasized is the male body and physical strength a man must have in order to gain respect. In many ways this is through violence.
The main arguments to support the thesis were in the opening minutes of the film when a group of men were asked the meaning of a real man. Many of them said the same descriptions, like tough and masculine. The men were then asked the consequences that come with not being masculine or fitting the male perception. They said words like “Soft, fag or pussy” would be used to describe the male not fitting the perceptions.
This film relates to the course because we have continually discussing deviance and deviant behavior. In the book Readings in Deviant Behavior there is a section called “What Triggers School Shootings?” which covers the bullying of homophobic people in high schools. In this chapter it mentions that most violence is committed by men. In relation to the film and the course, it gives the notion that men need to be a certain way because that is how society wants it. What we see in media and advertising really hints that this is the ways things are supposed to be when in fact they aren’t.
The point I found most convincing was action figures scene. They compare 40 years of masculine development to action figures like, GI Joe, Batman and Superman. It is impossible to the male figure to look like that. It shows the deception in sizes and ability which gives a false perception to boys that that’s how a man looks and acts. This relates the class discussion about deviant bodies and how society views people based on their size and ability. What I found least convincing was that movies and music were the problem. They do contribute very little in part to the problem. Not all movies and films are impacting the society.
If I were to conduct a study around this I would conduct it around boys aged 5 -18. I would study the young boy’s perception of a “real man”. Then study their perceptions when they become 18. I would like to see the differences on the issue of masculinity. The age difference and years of being in this society should make the study more legitimate.
The main arguments to support the thesis were in the opening minutes of the film when a group of men were asked the meaning of a real man. Many of them said the same descriptions, like tough and masculine. The men were then asked the consequences that come with not being masculine or fitting the male perception. They said words like “Soft, fag or pussy” would be used to describe the male not fitting the perceptions.
This film relates to the course because we have continually discussing deviance and deviant behavior. In the book Readings in Deviant Behavior there is a section called “What Triggers School Shootings?” which covers the bullying of homophobic people in high schools. In this chapter it mentions that most violence is committed by men. In relation to the film and the course, it gives the notion that men need to be a certain way because that is how society wants it. What we see in media and advertising really hints that this is the ways things are supposed to be when in fact they aren’t.
The point I found most convincing was action figures scene. They compare 40 years of masculine development to action figures like, GI Joe, Batman and Superman. It is impossible to the male figure to look like that. It shows the deception in sizes and ability which gives a false perception to boys that that’s how a man looks and acts. This relates the class discussion about deviant bodies and how society views people based on their size and ability. What I found least convincing was that movies and music were the problem. They do contribute very little in part to the problem. Not all movies and films are impacting the society.
If I were to conduct a study around this I would conduct it around boys aged 5 -18. I would study the young boy’s perception of a “real man”. Then study their perceptions when they become 18. I would like to see the differences on the issue of masculinity. The age difference and years of being in this society should make the study more legitimate.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Film Review 2: Murderball
The film Murderball is about the United States and the Canadian Paralympics quad rugby team. This film focuses on how people with disabilities and how there are just as capable and as able bodied people. This film shows disabled people in comparison to any other athlete. The different backgrounds, relationships and struggles the athletes have been through in life are some of the most interesting points in this film.
The film Murderball really tries to remove the stigma from individuals with impairments. Having a disability is seen as deviant in this society. In “You’re Not a Retard, You’re just Wise,” Steven Taylor says “A stigma is not merely a difference but a characteristic that deeply discredits a person’s moral character.” (Taylor, 2000). One other interesting point that the film focuses on is sexual intercourse and the ability to have sex. Another focus is about Mark Zupan and how he just wants to be treated equal despite that he is in a wheel chair. Society gest the notion that everybody who is disabled gets looked down on.
The thesis of this film relates to the course because we have been discussing deviant bodies and how society portrays them. A deviant body or anything outside the norms is considered deviant to society. You are treated and looked at differently by others.
One of the points I found most convincing was how the reality of not being able to walk was not being realized or coped with at first. The belief that one may walk again was still believed. But it took time to settle in with reality that walking will never happen again. Another point that is convincing about Murderball was the emotional affects that individuals had from being judged and dehumanized. The fact that not everyone in a wheelchair wants to walk was also a good point. The “Supercrip” blog relates to this also because we portray the disabled differently than they portray themselves
There was not a point in the film that I found least convincing. The film was good and very informative. The knowledge received from the film in regards to disabilities was great.
A question that would most stick out for me is finding out how people in wheelchairs are adjusting in the first year. I would also study their progress a few years down the road to see how they are doing. I would study other races as well.
The film Murderball really tries to remove the stigma from individuals with impairments. Having a disability is seen as deviant in this society. In “You’re Not a Retard, You’re just Wise,” Steven Taylor says “A stigma is not merely a difference but a characteristic that deeply discredits a person’s moral character.” (Taylor, 2000). One other interesting point that the film focuses on is sexual intercourse and the ability to have sex. Another focus is about Mark Zupan and how he just wants to be treated equal despite that he is in a wheel chair. Society gest the notion that everybody who is disabled gets looked down on.
The thesis of this film relates to the course because we have been discussing deviant bodies and how society portrays them. A deviant body or anything outside the norms is considered deviant to society. You are treated and looked at differently by others.
One of the points I found most convincing was how the reality of not being able to walk was not being realized or coped with at first. The belief that one may walk again was still believed. But it took time to settle in with reality that walking will never happen again. Another point that is convincing about Murderball was the emotional affects that individuals had from being judged and dehumanized. The fact that not everyone in a wheelchair wants to walk was also a good point. The “Supercrip” blog relates to this also because we portray the disabled differently than they portray themselves
There was not a point in the film that I found least convincing. The film was good and very informative. The knowledge received from the film in regards to disabilities was great.
A question that would most stick out for me is finding out how people in wheelchairs are adjusting in the first year. I would also study their progress a few years down the road to see how they are doing. I would study other races as well.
The Power of Words
There are many ways that words can be used in our society. Words can be powerful. They can change lives and societies. But importantly, words can be used out of its original context in ways that can offend or hurt people. Words hold weight in ways that many people cannot imagine. In today’s society many people call each other names using words without knowing its true meaning and how a word evolved to its so called “new meaning”. The word I decided to focus on is used commonly in our society and is offensive to many: retard. The word ‘Retard’ is used to mean relatively slow in mental, emotional or physical development. This word appeared first in Middle English in 1400 (dictionary.com).
What is interesting about the use of the word retard or retarded is that it commonly used in society and has in some cases has sadly become a norm attached within many individuals speech. The frustration of having to take a test or gossiping about people usually has this word attached with it out of context, which is pointless and offensive. The fact that this is said regularly toward and amongst individuals brings my attention to Labeling Theory. According to Howard Becker he says “The deviant is one to whom that label is successfully been applied; deviant behavior is behavior that people so label”. If a person acts or says something in a certain way that is opposing to another person’s view, they can be labeled. A person who is most likely to use the phrase ‘retard’ or ‘retarded’ is someone who is ignorant and thoughtless to those who have mental and physical disabilities. The underling construction of the word retarded is that people are mentally slow and incapable of doing something that others are able to do. The word is in many ways compared to being called stupid because it also gives the label that one is incapable or lacks in something.
The community that is impacted by this “r word” is those who are "considered" mentally and physically challenged. Being called retarded is also similar to the phrase “That’s gay”. Another theory that comes to mind in relation to this issue is the Shaming Theory. A person can be perceived as deviant because of an act or behavior, which is tied into stigmatization. John Braithwaite mentions that shaming means all social processes of expressing disapproval that has the effect of provoking remorse in the individual being condemned by others who become aware of the shaming (34). Many people view this community as “retarded” and “stupid” automatically when that is not the case. In Steven Taylors "You're Not A Retard, You're Just Wise" he dicusses his study of the Dukes and how they have been labeled as disabled. But the Dukes do not attach the same meanings of disability labels found in society. In the clip below it shows how offensive words can be and how we need to be careful of the words we choose to use when speaking to or around other people. The members of the relevant community show that this word needs to stop being used.
I personally have grown to understand that being called retarded” or retard is not acceptable to this community, even though society may view them that way. I have a relative who is a part of this community. I can say he fits in just fine with society without a needing label. The norms that are socially constructed in this country have made individuals think ignorant, selfish and careless. That way of thinking does not make issues better. A message Wanda Sykes brings attention to in the clip below relates to this issue also, though it is another phrase commonly used. Not realizing what we say is insulting to others. Case and point, phrases like “That’s so retarded” or “What a retard” are phrases that hurt people’s feelings. We all need to watch are words.
Word Count: 618
Work Cited
-Becker, Howard S. Labeling Theory. Chapter 7. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA.
-Braithwaite, John. Shaming Theory. Chapter 6. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA.
-Taylor, Steven J. "You're Not A Retard, You're Just Wise". Chapter 26. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/retardation
What is interesting about the use of the word retard or retarded is that it commonly used in society and has in some cases has sadly become a norm attached within many individuals speech. The frustration of having to take a test or gossiping about people usually has this word attached with it out of context, which is pointless and offensive. The fact that this is said regularly toward and amongst individuals brings my attention to Labeling Theory. According to Howard Becker he says “The deviant is one to whom that label is successfully been applied; deviant behavior is behavior that people so label”. If a person acts or says something in a certain way that is opposing to another person’s view, they can be labeled. A person who is most likely to use the phrase ‘retard’ or ‘retarded’ is someone who is ignorant and thoughtless to those who have mental and physical disabilities. The underling construction of the word retarded is that people are mentally slow and incapable of doing something that others are able to do. The word is in many ways compared to being called stupid because it also gives the label that one is incapable or lacks in something.
The community that is impacted by this “r word” is those who are "considered" mentally and physically challenged. Being called retarded is also similar to the phrase “That’s gay”. Another theory that comes to mind in relation to this issue is the Shaming Theory. A person can be perceived as deviant because of an act or behavior, which is tied into stigmatization. John Braithwaite mentions that shaming means all social processes of expressing disapproval that has the effect of provoking remorse in the individual being condemned by others who become aware of the shaming (34). Many people view this community as “retarded” and “stupid” automatically when that is not the case. In Steven Taylors "You're Not A Retard, You're Just Wise" he dicusses his study of the Dukes and how they have been labeled as disabled. But the Dukes do not attach the same meanings of disability labels found in society. In the clip below it shows how offensive words can be and how we need to be careful of the words we choose to use when speaking to or around other people. The members of the relevant community show that this word needs to stop being used.
I personally have grown to understand that being called retarded” or retard is not acceptable to this community, even though society may view them that way. I have a relative who is a part of this community. I can say he fits in just fine with society without a needing label. The norms that are socially constructed in this country have made individuals think ignorant, selfish and careless. That way of thinking does not make issues better. A message Wanda Sykes brings attention to in the clip below relates to this issue also, though it is another phrase commonly used. Not realizing what we say is insulting to others. Case and point, phrases like “That’s so retarded” or “What a retard” are phrases that hurt people’s feelings. We all need to watch are words.
Word Count: 618
Work Cited
-Becker, Howard S. Labeling Theory. Chapter 7. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA.
-Braithwaite, John. Shaming Theory. Chapter 6. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA.
-Taylor, Steven J. "You're Not A Retard, You're Just Wise". Chapter 26. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Calhoun, Conyers and Thio. 2010. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/retardation
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Film Review 1: Middle Sexes
1. In the film “Middle Sexes: Redefining He and She,” it informs the audience of just that. The thesis of the film is about personal documentary and stories that involve sex, gender, transgender, and intersex people. In the film the audience is able to discover the challenges of transgender and intersex individuals and the steps it will take to have their male or female sex organs removed. What is also focused on is how society views this kind of transformation and behavior while having to deal with society.
2. Some of the main arguments in support of the thesis involve parents and couples who want to guard and protect their family from being harmed by society. Another issue focused on how society does not understand the trouble and hard ache that a person has to go through with living among others who do not accept this way of life.
3. The thesis of this film relates to the course because these people are prime examples of what is seen as deviant to society. One of the stories in this film focuses on 8 years Noah. Noah does different things that other boys his age are considered not to do for example; play with dolls and dress up like a girl. He is accepted and loved by his family but his parents fear the worst because of suicide or harm from other people. In the article by Anne Fausto called “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are Not Enough,” she explains that society will not always embrace intersexuality (Fausto Sterling 24). As Noah continues to act in his ways, society may not fully accept him as he gets older. But society today is turning more so to accepting homosexuality.
4. One of the points that stood out to me in the film was in Thailand. It was interesting to see that some of the performers were transsexual and transgender females. It was interesting to see how society accepted them there and that it was one of the country’s biggest tourist attractions. In our society this is considered deviant and viewed by many as a disorder of dysfunction.
5. One of the points I found that was least convincing was that this film was more about information and awareness on intersex and transgender individuals. If the film was more about ways on breaking the norms and barriers against transgender it would grasp more attention in society.
6. I think that Noah’s story stands out the most to me. Why was Noah acting the way he acted? As he gets older I would research his growth and progress. Will he change his ways and become different during puberty? Or will his parents get him on some kind of medications to get him to change? I would compare Noah’s situation to Labeling Theory by Howard Becker. He was picked on and called names by other boys and girls. If Noah is to continue his ways, he will be labeled by others and considered deviant by society. I would study Noah’s progress throughout his teenage years and see what changes, if any, have been made.
2. Some of the main arguments in support of the thesis involve parents and couples who want to guard and protect their family from being harmed by society. Another issue focused on how society does not understand the trouble and hard ache that a person has to go through with living among others who do not accept this way of life.
3. The thesis of this film relates to the course because these people are prime examples of what is seen as deviant to society. One of the stories in this film focuses on 8 years Noah. Noah does different things that other boys his age are considered not to do for example; play with dolls and dress up like a girl. He is accepted and loved by his family but his parents fear the worst because of suicide or harm from other people. In the article by Anne Fausto called “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are Not Enough,” she explains that society will not always embrace intersexuality (Fausto Sterling 24). As Noah continues to act in his ways, society may not fully accept him as he gets older. But society today is turning more so to accepting homosexuality.
4. One of the points that stood out to me in the film was in Thailand. It was interesting to see that some of the performers were transsexual and transgender females. It was interesting to see how society accepted them there and that it was one of the country’s biggest tourist attractions. In our society this is considered deviant and viewed by many as a disorder of dysfunction.
5. One of the points I found that was least convincing was that this film was more about information and awareness on intersex and transgender individuals. If the film was more about ways on breaking the norms and barriers against transgender it would grasp more attention in society.
6. I think that Noah’s story stands out the most to me. Why was Noah acting the way he acted? As he gets older I would research his growth and progress. Will he change his ways and become different during puberty? Or will his parents get him on some kind of medications to get him to change? I would compare Noah’s situation to Labeling Theory by Howard Becker. He was picked on and called names by other boys and girls. If Noah is to continue his ways, he will be labeled by others and considered deviant by society. I would study Noah’s progress throughout his teenage years and see what changes, if any, have been made.
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Rod, Deviant?
Rod was born in San Diego California but was raised in the Los Angeles for a majority of his life. Both of his parents were married. His father graduated from Oregon State University and his mother graduated from the University of Oregon. Rod’s upbringing as a child was different from other children. Rod and his older brother Calvin did not live with their parents in Portland, Oregon, but instead they both lived with their grandmother and grandfather in Los Angeles. Rod and Calvin did almost everything together growing up. Rod looked up to his older brother while Calvin consistently got into trouble. Consequently, Calvin would always get punished by his grandparents for disobedient and deviant ways.
One summer Rod and Calvin were outside playing baseball with some neighborhood friends as they did almost every day around noon. While playing, one of the kids hit the ball so hard it went over a neighbor’s fence. After the ball went over the fence the boys ended up with no ball to play with. They all gathered around to see who had an extra ball or who was able to get an extra ball. Unfortunately none of the kids were able. After a while of giving thoughts on where to get a ball, Calvin came up with an idea. He left and came back to the field 10 minutes later with a ball. None of the kids asked questions and they continued to play ball.
While continuing to play baseball the game once again came to a stop because a kid hit the ball into a large nearby pond. All the kids gathered back together to figure out where to get another ball. While gathering their thoughts Calvin made it a point to get that particular ball back. The kids asked why and Calvin explained it was a ball from his grandfather’s collection which was signed by Jose Conseco of the Oakland A’s. The kids were shocked and made it a mission to get the ball out from the large pond. Unfortunately there was no luck getting the ball back that afternoon. This situation is similar to the film The Sandlot. In the clip below it shows how a group of kids playing baseball lose a highly valued ball in a backyard. The kids do what they can to retrieve it.
Calvin made sure that Rod would not say anything to their grandfather. When they both got home their grandfather asked Calvin about the baseball and Calvin lied. Their grandfather called their parents in Portland and told them what Calvin did. Their grandfather was so mad he told Calvin he could no longer stay in his household. The next day Calvin was on a plane to Portland.
When Calvin moved, Rod was sad. He had nobody to look up to or play with anymore. He became frustrated that he had to be alone. Eventually Rod would end up stealing and lying like his older brother used to do. This got Rod into trouble. During school and while hanging out with friends Rod would teach others how act and commit the same bad behaviors.
When looking at Rods life, there are couple theories that may explain Rods deviant behavior. The first theory is Differential Association Theory by Edwin H. Sutherland, and Donald R. Cressey (1977). The theory says “When criminal behavior is learned, the learning includes (a) techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes very complicated” (Cressey and Sutherland, 27). When Calvin moved his parents Rod started to act like Calvin. Before Calvin moved, Rod would not act in a deviant manner. Rods behavior was learned from his older brother and he did not want to quit his deviant behavior. According to Sutherland and Cressey they say “The principal part of the learning of criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups”. Calvin would lie and steal consistently and Rod would observe.
Another theory that relates to why Rod commits deviant acts is Control Theory by Travis Hirschi (1969). According to Hirschi he states “Control theories assume that the delinquent acts result when an individual’s bond is weak or broken”. When Calvin moved, Rods heart was broken and the delinquent acts started. Hirschi further explains that in order to avoid deviant acts you must have involvement in conventional activities. Rod and Calvin played baseball together and did other activities. Their parents and grandparents were not always around which gave both Rod and Calvin time and reason to commit deviant acts and behavior. There may be other explanations and theories that can relate to Rods life and deviant behavior, but Differential Association and Control Theory help explain why Rod engaged in the behaviors and acts he did.
Edwin H. Sutherland and Donald R. Cressey. (1977). Criminology. In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 27-29). Boston, MA
Travis Hirschi. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 30-32). Boston, MA
Word Count 783
Part 2
In my experiment and experience on acting deviant for an hour, I noticed different reactions from random people and how they treated me. On February 3, 2012, I went to the Westfield shopping mall with a friend. I chose to experiment walking through the mall for an hour wearing my clothes on backwards. As I entered the mall I automatically received weird looks from people. The first floor of the mall is where I walked through first. I went inside a few stores and I could notice people giggling at me. When I walked inside the Old Navy store I overheard a young girl tell her mother “Mom, why does that dummy have his clothes on the wrong way?” When I went to the second floor I arrived at the food court. At that moment people were starring, pointing and laughing. Shortly after, I made my way through a few other stores and ended up at a jewelry store. While in the store I was given immediate attention by the jeweler as if I did not belong inside that store. My friend and I left the mall a while after.
My appearance was considered deviant by mainstream society because it went against the normality’s that society views as normal. The norms are that you are supposed to wear clotes the forward way. The potential harm for having this appearance is getting made fun of and called names by people around you and are considered an outcast. People’s reaction towards me was a times not pleasant, especially when I went into the jewelry store. I felt like I was automatically labeled deviant and an idiot to society. I relate my experience and experiment to Howard S. Becker’s Labeling Theory. According to Becker he explains that deviance is defined on an agreed upon rule, and if the rule is broken or not broken, society labels you deviant (39). In conducting my experiment at the mall, society viewed me as “breaking the rule” which labeled me as deviant. This also relates to Images of Deviance by Stephen Pfohl’s who says “Are there actions truly more harmful than the actions of people not labeled as deviants?” Pfohl says no (Pfohl,1994). Based on my experience on appearing deviant at the mall, my actions were not harmful but some in society may see it as harmful.
Howard S. Becker. (1963). Group from Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 39-41). Boston, MA
Stephen Pfohl. (1994). Images of Being Deviant: In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 11-14). Boston, MA.
Word Count 389
One summer Rod and Calvin were outside playing baseball with some neighborhood friends as they did almost every day around noon. While playing, one of the kids hit the ball so hard it went over a neighbor’s fence. After the ball went over the fence the boys ended up with no ball to play with. They all gathered around to see who had an extra ball or who was able to get an extra ball. Unfortunately none of the kids were able. After a while of giving thoughts on where to get a ball, Calvin came up with an idea. He left and came back to the field 10 minutes later with a ball. None of the kids asked questions and they continued to play ball.
While continuing to play baseball the game once again came to a stop because a kid hit the ball into a large nearby pond. All the kids gathered back together to figure out where to get another ball. While gathering their thoughts Calvin made it a point to get that particular ball back. The kids asked why and Calvin explained it was a ball from his grandfather’s collection which was signed by Jose Conseco of the Oakland A’s. The kids were shocked and made it a mission to get the ball out from the large pond. Unfortunately there was no luck getting the ball back that afternoon. This situation is similar to the film The Sandlot. In the clip below it shows how a group of kids playing baseball lose a highly valued ball in a backyard. The kids do what they can to retrieve it.
Calvin made sure that Rod would not say anything to their grandfather. When they both got home their grandfather asked Calvin about the baseball and Calvin lied. Their grandfather called their parents in Portland and told them what Calvin did. Their grandfather was so mad he told Calvin he could no longer stay in his household. The next day Calvin was on a plane to Portland.
When Calvin moved, Rod was sad. He had nobody to look up to or play with anymore. He became frustrated that he had to be alone. Eventually Rod would end up stealing and lying like his older brother used to do. This got Rod into trouble. During school and while hanging out with friends Rod would teach others how act and commit the same bad behaviors.
When looking at Rods life, there are couple theories that may explain Rods deviant behavior. The first theory is Differential Association Theory by Edwin H. Sutherland, and Donald R. Cressey (1977). The theory says “When criminal behavior is learned, the learning includes (a) techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes very complicated” (Cressey and Sutherland, 27). When Calvin moved his parents Rod started to act like Calvin. Before Calvin moved, Rod would not act in a deviant manner. Rods behavior was learned from his older brother and he did not want to quit his deviant behavior. According to Sutherland and Cressey they say “The principal part of the learning of criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups”. Calvin would lie and steal consistently and Rod would observe.
Another theory that relates to why Rod commits deviant acts is Control Theory by Travis Hirschi (1969). According to Hirschi he states “Control theories assume that the delinquent acts result when an individual’s bond is weak or broken”. When Calvin moved, Rods heart was broken and the delinquent acts started. Hirschi further explains that in order to avoid deviant acts you must have involvement in conventional activities. Rod and Calvin played baseball together and did other activities. Their parents and grandparents were not always around which gave both Rod and Calvin time and reason to commit deviant acts and behavior. There may be other explanations and theories that can relate to Rods life and deviant behavior, but Differential Association and Control Theory help explain why Rod engaged in the behaviors and acts he did.
Edwin H. Sutherland and Donald R. Cressey. (1977). Criminology. In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 27-29). Boston, MA
Travis Hirschi. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 30-32). Boston, MA
Word Count 783
Part 2
In my experiment and experience on acting deviant for an hour, I noticed different reactions from random people and how they treated me. On February 3, 2012, I went to the Westfield shopping mall with a friend. I chose to experiment walking through the mall for an hour wearing my clothes on backwards. As I entered the mall I automatically received weird looks from people. The first floor of the mall is where I walked through first. I went inside a few stores and I could notice people giggling at me. When I walked inside the Old Navy store I overheard a young girl tell her mother “Mom, why does that dummy have his clothes on the wrong way?” When I went to the second floor I arrived at the food court. At that moment people were starring, pointing and laughing. Shortly after, I made my way through a few other stores and ended up at a jewelry store. While in the store I was given immediate attention by the jeweler as if I did not belong inside that store. My friend and I left the mall a while after.
My appearance was considered deviant by mainstream society because it went against the normality’s that society views as normal. The norms are that you are supposed to wear clotes the forward way. The potential harm for having this appearance is getting made fun of and called names by people around you and are considered an outcast. People’s reaction towards me was a times not pleasant, especially when I went into the jewelry store. I felt like I was automatically labeled deviant and an idiot to society. I relate my experience and experiment to Howard S. Becker’s Labeling Theory. According to Becker he explains that deviance is defined on an agreed upon rule, and if the rule is broken or not broken, society labels you deviant (39). In conducting my experiment at the mall, society viewed me as “breaking the rule” which labeled me as deviant. This also relates to Images of Deviance by Stephen Pfohl’s who says “Are there actions truly more harmful than the actions of people not labeled as deviants?” Pfohl says no (Pfohl,1994). Based on my experience on appearing deviant at the mall, my actions were not harmful but some in society may see it as harmful.
Howard S. Becker. (1963). Group from Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 39-41). Boston, MA
Stephen Pfohl. (1994). Images of Being Deviant: In Alex Thio, Thomas C. Calhoun, and Addrain Conyers (Eds.), Readings in Deviant Behavior (pp. 11-14). Boston, MA.
Word Count 389
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Deviant hip hop?
In the last seventy years music has evolved to become a major part of American culture. Some may agree that the genre of hip hop music has had a large impact on different cultures around the world. Hip hop is not only about music, but it is also about culture (urbandictionary.com). This has changed the way many people view this genre of music. In America, people may listen to and view hip hop music as corrupt, delinquent, violent, drug abusing, defiant, womanizing, greedy and deviant. But there are different styles within hip hop music that are still considered to be hip hop (about.com). In these styles there are some hip hop songs that can be considered "deviant" or "normal". This depends on what the artist’s character, song, and videos portray. One of the issues that will be focused on will be about what songs tend to be considered deviant or normal in this genre of music and why, as well as the consequences in being deviant.
In hip hop, who is considered deviant? Hip hop music has different styles that come from various artists (about.com). The considered deviant hip hop artist creates song lyrics and videos about money, women, cars, hustling, violence, the streets, drugs and partying. It seems as if the artists strive to be different from eachother and society. As a consequence, artists considered deviant may automatically be viewed as a menace to society because of what they do is opposite to society’s norms. For example, the hip hop artist’s style of dress may consist of sagging pants, baseball caps, tattoos, jewelry, new sneakers or boots, and fitted or loose t-shirts. These things the along with what is talked about in the music may categorize the artist as deviant. This is similar to Domenick Scuderas article called My Gay Lifestyle where he explains how everything is gay in the lifestyle he lives.
In relation to music and the lifestyle of the hip hop artist, it can be considered deviant in the eyes of society to dress how you want, live how you want and talk how you want. The style of dress hip hop artist’s wear and how they use music may be considered deviant to society, but the style is not the typical dress in all of the hip hop culture. In the article called Privilege, Power, Difference, and Us by Allan Johnson it says “In other words, if you’re not going along with the system, it won’t be long before people notice and let you know it” (Johnson, 85). The dress, styles, use of speech, are different to the norms of society which is something that hip hop culture is about regardless of what the norms are and what people say.
Other hip hop artists create songs and videos that deal with current world events, corrupt political and governmental systems and the everyday struggles people face to raise the consciousness. This can be considered "normal" because the music and the artist’s presentation and content the music focuses’ are issues that people can relate to. The videos and songs might be considered more tolerable to viewers; however they may also contain some aspects of what is considered deviant behavior, but not as extreme. To focus more on what is considered normal in hip hop may not be considered normal to certain people in society, even though the artist may not be deviant or portray deviant behavior.
The consequences of being deviant in hip hop music can be an issue. If you are a hip hop artist and are acting against the norms of society, then the consequences can sometimes result in penalty. In the book Deviant Behavior by Alex Thio, Thomas Calhoun and Addrain Conyers it says “The answer…is that labeled deviance are viewed as such because they threaten the control of people who have enough power to shape the way society imagines the boundary between good and bad, normal and pathological, acceptable and deviant” (Pfohl, 14). Does deviant behavior in relation to music have this kind of power to shape society? If so, the cultures arond the world would be diffrent.
Work Cited/References
Calhoun, Conyers, and Thio. Readings in Deviant Behavior. 6th ed. Boston, MA.
http://rap.about.com/od/genresstyles/tp/HipHopGenreGuide.htm
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hip-hop
Scudera, Domenick. 2011. "My Gay Lifestyle," Huffpost Gay Voices, November, 1, pp. 1.
Johnson, Allan. "Privilege, Power, Difference, and Us." Pp. 78-86. Previlege, A Reader, edited by M.S. Kimmel and A.L. Ferber.
In hip hop, who is considered deviant? Hip hop music has different styles that come from various artists (about.com). The considered deviant hip hop artist creates song lyrics and videos about money, women, cars, hustling, violence, the streets, drugs and partying. It seems as if the artists strive to be different from eachother and society. As a consequence, artists considered deviant may automatically be viewed as a menace to society because of what they do is opposite to society’s norms. For example, the hip hop artist’s style of dress may consist of sagging pants, baseball caps, tattoos, jewelry, new sneakers or boots, and fitted or loose t-shirts. These things the along with what is talked about in the music may categorize the artist as deviant. This is similar to Domenick Scuderas article called My Gay Lifestyle where he explains how everything is gay in the lifestyle he lives.
In relation to music and the lifestyle of the hip hop artist, it can be considered deviant in the eyes of society to dress how you want, live how you want and talk how you want. The style of dress hip hop artist’s wear and how they use music may be considered deviant to society, but the style is not the typical dress in all of the hip hop culture. In the article called Privilege, Power, Difference, and Us by Allan Johnson it says “In other words, if you’re not going along with the system, it won’t be long before people notice and let you know it” (Johnson, 85). The dress, styles, use of speech, are different to the norms of society which is something that hip hop culture is about regardless of what the norms are and what people say.
Other hip hop artists create songs and videos that deal with current world events, corrupt political and governmental systems and the everyday struggles people face to raise the consciousness. This can be considered "normal" because the music and the artist’s presentation and content the music focuses’ are issues that people can relate to. The videos and songs might be considered more tolerable to viewers; however they may also contain some aspects of what is considered deviant behavior, but not as extreme. To focus more on what is considered normal in hip hop may not be considered normal to certain people in society, even though the artist may not be deviant or portray deviant behavior.
The consequences of being deviant in hip hop music can be an issue. If you are a hip hop artist and are acting against the norms of society, then the consequences can sometimes result in penalty. In the book Deviant Behavior by Alex Thio, Thomas Calhoun and Addrain Conyers it says “The answer…is that labeled deviance are viewed as such because they threaten the control of people who have enough power to shape the way society imagines the boundary between good and bad, normal and pathological, acceptable and deviant” (Pfohl, 14). Does deviant behavior in relation to music have this kind of power to shape society? If so, the cultures arond the world would be diffrent.
Work Cited/References
Calhoun, Conyers, and Thio. Readings in Deviant Behavior. 6th ed. Boston, MA.
http://rap.about.com/od/genresstyles/tp/HipHopGenreGuide.htm
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hip-hop
Scudera, Domenick. 2011. "My Gay Lifestyle," Huffpost Gay Voices, November, 1, pp. 1.
Johnson, Allan. "Privilege, Power, Difference, and Us." Pp. 78-86. Previlege, A Reader, edited by M.S. Kimmel and A.L. Ferber.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)